Select Page

Stock-Based Compensation: Definition, Usage, and Vesting Models

by | Jun 8, 2024 | Financial dictionary | 0 comments

Stock-based compensation has become an increasingly popular way for companies to incentivize and reward employees. By granting equity-based awards, such as restricted stock or stock options, companies can align employee interests with those of shareholders and foster a sense of ownership and long-term commitment. However, accounting for and reporting stock-based compensation can be complex, with specific guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718.

Understanding Stock-Based Compensation

Definition of Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation, also known as equity-based awards, refers to the practice of granting company stock or stock options to employees as part of their compensation package. These awards are typically subject to vesting conditions, such as continued employment or achievement of performance targets, and aim to align employee interests with those of shareholders.

By offering stock-based compensation, companies can attract and retain talented employees while conserving cash. The value of these awards is tied to the company’s stock price, providing employees with a direct financial incentive to contribute to the company’s success and drive long-term shareholder value.

Types of Equity-Based Awards

There are several types of equity-based awards commonly used in stock-based compensation plans:

  • Restricted Stock: Shares of company stock granted to employees that are subject to vesting conditions and restrictions on transfer. The employee receives the full value of the shares upon vesting.
  • Stock Options: Contracts that give employees the right to purchase a specified number of shares at a predetermined price (the exercise price) within a certain time frame. Options typically vest over time and have an expiration date.
  • Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs): Similar to stock options, SARs provide employees with the right to receive the appreciation in the company’s stock price over a specified period, settled in either cash or shares.
  • Performance Shares/Units: Awards that vest based on the achievement of specific performance goals, such as revenue growth or earnings per share targets.

The choice of equity-based award depends on factors such as the company’s goals, industry norms, and regulatory requirements. Many companies use a combination of award types to create a balanced and effective compensation program.

Accounting Treatment of Stock-Based Compensation

ASC 718 Guidance for Public Companies

In the United States, the accounting treatment for stock-based compensation is governed by ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation. This guidance, issued by the FASB, requires public companies to recognize the fair value of equity-based awards granted to employees as compensation expense over the vesting period.

Under ASC 718, the fair value of stock options is determined using an option-pricing model, such as the Black-Scholes or binomial models, which take into account factors such as the exercise price, expected term, stock price volatility, and risk-free interest rate. The fair value of restricted stock and performance shares is generally based on the market price of the company’s stock on the grant date.

Special Considerations for Nonpublic Companies and Nonemployees

While ASC 718 primarily focuses on awards granted by public companies to employees, it also provides guidance for nonpublic companies and awards granted to nonemployees. Nonpublic companies may elect to measure stock-based compensation awards using the intrinsic value method, which recognizes compensation expense based on the difference between the fair value of the stock and the exercise price, if any.

For awards granted to nonemployees, such as consultants or advisors, the measurement date for determining fair value is generally the date at which the services are complete, rather than the grant date used for employee awards. This reflects the fact that nonemployee awards are often tied to the completion of specific services or milestones.

Impact on Financial Statements

The recognition of stock-based compensation expense affects several key financial statements:

Financial Statement Impact of Stock-Based Compensation
Income Statement Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period, reducing net income.
Balance Sheet Equity-classified awards increase additional paid-in capital (APIC), while liability-classified awards are recorded as liabilities.
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity The issuance of shares or exercise of options increases common stock and APIC.
Statement of Cash Flows Non-cash compensation expense is added back to net income in the operating section, while the tax benefit from stock-based compensation is reported as a financing activity.

By understanding the impact of stock-based compensation on financial statements, investors and analysts can better assess a company’s true economic performance and make informed decisions.

Financial Analysis and Valuation Implications

Adjusting Earnings Metrics for Stock-Based Compensation

When analyzing a company’s financial performance, it is important to consider the impact of stock-based compensation expense (SBC expense). As SBC expense is a non-cash charge, some analysts and investors may choose to exclude it when calculating metrics such as earnings per share (EPS) or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) to better understand the company’s underlying cash flow and operational performance.

However, it is crucial to recognize that SBC expense represents a real economic cost to the company and its shareholders. By granting equity-based awards, the company is effectively transferring value from existing shareholders to employees. Ignoring SBC expense in financial analysis can lead to an overstatement of a company’s profitability and cash flow generation.

Impact on Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Valuation

Stock-based compensation also has implications for valuation models, particularly the discounted cash flow (DCF) approach. In a DCF model, future cash flows are projected and then discounted back to their present value using a required rate of return. Failing to account for SBC expense in these projections can lead to an overvaluation of the company.

When incorporating SBC expense into a DCF model, analysts should consider the following:

  • Dilution: As equity-based awards vest and are exercised, the number of outstanding shares increases, diluting existing shareholders. This dilution should be reflected in the model’s share count and EPS projections.
  • Cash Flow Adjustments: While SBC expense is a non-cash charge, it does have cash flow implications. The tax benefit associated with stock-based compensation should be treated as a financing cash inflow rather than an operating cash flow.
  • Consistency: If SBC expense is excluded from the cash flow projections, the discount rate should be adjusted accordingly to ensure consistency between the numerator and denominator in the DCF calculation.

Failing to properly account for SBC expense in valuation models can lead to an overstatement of a company’s intrinsic value and potentially misleading investment decisions.

Presentation and Disclosure Requirements

Classification as Equity or Liability

Under ASC 718, stock-based compensation awards are classified as either equity or liabilities on the balance sheet. Equity-classified awards, such as restricted stock and most stock options, are reported within the stockholders’ equity section of the balance sheet. Liability-classified awards, such as cash-settled SARs or awards with certain redemption features, are reported as liabilities.

For liability-classified awards, the company must remeasure the fair value of the award at each reporting date until settlement, with changes in fair value recognized as compensation expense. If the award is expected to be settled within one year or upon demand, it is classified as a current liability; otherwise, it is classified as a noncurrent liability.

Disclosure of Stock-Based Compensation in Financial Statements

Companies are required to disclose significant information about their stock-based compensation plans in their financial statements and accompanying footnotes, including:

  • Description of the Plan: The nature and general terms of stock-based compensation plans, including vesting conditions and the maximum term of options granted.
  • Compensation Expense: The total stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period and the related tax benefit. This expense should be allocated to the appropriate line items on the income statement, such as cost of goods sold, research and development, or general and administrative expenses.
  • Valuation Assumptions: The methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of awards, such as expected volatility, expected term, risk-free interest rate, and expected dividends.
  • Award Activity: A reconciliation of the number of shares or options outstanding, including grants, exercises, forfeitures, and expirations during the period.
  • Unrecognized Compensation Cost: The total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards and the weighted-average period over which it is expected to be recognized.

In addition to these disclosures, companies must also report the intrinsic value of options exercised and the fair value of shares vested during the period. Footnotes should also include information about the company’s policy for issuing shares upon option exercise (e.g., new shares or treasury shares) and any tax benefits realized from stock-based compensation.

By providing comprehensive and transparent disclosures about stock-based compensation, companies enable investors and analysts to better understand the economic impact of these awards and make more informed decisions.

See also: